Below text originally in swedish on www.wik.inormous.net/sv ; ”Försvarsanställd varnade före dåden”

Excerpts;

A person from the Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten) strongly advised an acquaintance a couple of hours before the explotions in Stockholm City to stay away from Drottninggatan.

… in central Stockholm on Saturday where, several hours later, two explosions went off in what is being called a terrorist attack.

”If possible, avoid Drottninggatan today. A lot could happen there … just for your information”, the message said, according to TT news agency.

The continuing article from 12 dec 2010 (preview screendump in swedish, in english), mentions different comments on validity of given information and from whom one can expect more, e.g. MUST and Säpo (the Security Police).

Starring:
The ”very credible leak source” according to TT, public relations Jonas Svensson, Armed Forces information director Erik Lagersten, professor intelligence analysis Wilhelm Agrell, chief of security MUST John Daniels, professor Jurisprudence Dennis Töllborg and non replying swedish prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt via press secretary Roberta Alenius.

swapped articles

Above newsworthy article content did not just get a minuscule rubric, it was ‘article-swapped’ by four newspapers with a quite trivial and tendentious text; ”Family of 28 year old in Luton”, seemingly for linking these deeds in Stockholm with other ‘established’ links spanning from radicalized muslims, London 7/7, al-Qaida and 9/11. On these separately four news papers with three different owners and publishers they all plainly interchanged original article ”Military employee warned before attack” with ”Police at house of 28 year old in Luton” still ‘overtly’ keeping the same article number.

• SvD (owner Schibstedt) replaces original article with ”Police at house of 28 year old in Luton” with same article no 5804157 (original cached) A search on SvD (dec 14, 23:30) ”Försvarsanställd varnade” (Military employee warned) gives one hit (earlier no hit); Husrannsakan i bostad utanfor london (Search warrant in home outside of London) where we can read two meek sentences mentioning the warning from the military staffer.

• GD (owner MittMedia Förvaltnings AB) replaces article with ”Police at house of 28 year old in Luton” with same article no 1.2573986 (original cached). Can be found with new address

• ST (owner MittMedia Förvaltnings AB) replaces article with ”Police at house of 28 year old in Luton” with same article no 1.2573964 (original cached). Nothing found on st.nu web search.

• GP (owner Stampen AB) replaces article with ”Police at house of 28 year old in Luton” with same article no 1.509719 (original cached). Nothing found on gp.se web search.

new addresses

• Di (Bonnier) can be found with changed address

• Aftonbladet (Schibsted) article with new address

• DN (bonnier) ”Military employee warned of attack on Drottninggatan” New URL address ”Military employee warned of attack on Drottninggata”. (cached original)

or completely erased

• Aftonbladet Mobil (Schibsted) original article (cached) 8268828 erased ”Article not available The article has not been publiched”

a few unchanged

• TheLocal Unchanged Military staffer knew about attacks: report

• helagotland Unchanged Military employee warned before attack

subtle glitch in the matrix

Except for the fact that some credible information does slip through mostly in the beginning of a news phenomena like this. Except that this news article should if anything be 'echoed' in the media (read Assange), not become dribbled around and lost by any news publisher (the silence is telltale), how is it possible then that at least four, with three different owners and publishers misplace so similarly, so synchronously, and even erase it completely? The rubric says it all?

Despite the story itself being very important, true or not, is secondary to the subtle but obvious media shuffle as if being centrally controlled either directly by some powerful individuals or by a consensus/political correctness convention hindering us and dumbing us down.

more

TT Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå (Newspapers' Telegram Bureau) is run by above named players et al. in a ”cooperative model” that indeed might ”develop an open monopoly”, can be read on swedish wikipedia i.e a nice game of Gaylord [2] dialectic tennis between Bonnier & Schibstedt perhaps?

• Artikel Arkiv.zip (26MB) googlecached articles as originally published and changed articles (html, pdf, png etc).

Konspirationsteoretiker, Tea-party goers, anti-socialister, konstitutions-försvarare, anti-Obama-grupperingar etc etc & Glenn Beck i egenskap av “mainstream” skapar ökad oro och vrede i USA.

Är detta mer av uppvigling för mer våldsrelaterad revolution, vilket ju spär på anledningen att lagstifta än hårdare för ”terrorism at home”, snarare än kärleksfull evolution? Fox News har ju blivit riktigt konspirationbejakande på sistone och Glenn Beck leker Alex Jones både på Fox och på egen radioshow.

ADL (Anti-Defamation League) anar vad DHS (Department of Homeland Security) redan skrivit pamfletter om (Domestic Extremism Lexicon)

ADL; Rage Grows In America Conspiracy Theories Fuel Anti-Government Fervor

PS:Bildlänken ovan går till klipp där Beck pratar om Albert Gore Jr och att hans politiska manipulation når ner i åldrarna, allt för att befästa teorin om Global Warming eller Climate Change som det tenderar att kallas numera. Mainstream stigmtiserar gärna att man är Global Warming denier om man kritiserar Albert Gore et al. vilket drabbar Glenn Beck likaså. Någonting som ”passar” DHS vad det lider i sin märkliga lust att utöka definitionen av ”homegrown radicalization”.

Detta skapar resonanser i Sverige, då tex TV4 Kalla fakta illustrerar stämplande om sanningssökare .. som just ”extrema grupperingar” och ytterflera förhånande epitet. Såklart användes samma fraseologi (som vissa andra internationella vänner) e.g. ”radikalisering” av våra representanter i regering, frågan är väl bara hur lång tid innan dessa termer får vidare betydelseglidningar.

 
 
 
Glenn Beck agent provocateur?

Conspiracy theorists, Tea-party goers, anti-socialists, constitutions-defenders, anti-Obama-groups etc etc & Glenn Beck representing “mainstream” fuels growing rage in America.

Is this more  incitement for violent revolution, adding more reasons for draconian legislation for ”terrorism at home”, rather than loving evolution? Fox News has recently become conspiracy-cute and Glenn Beck play Alex Jones both on Fox and own radioshow.

ADL (Anti-Defamation League) claim what DHS (Department of Homeland Security) already wrote in their  Domestic Extremism Lexicon pamphlet

ADL; Rage Grows In America Conspiracy Theories Fuel Anti-Government Fervor

PS:Image link above where Glenn Beck talk of Albert Gore Jr and that his political manipulation reaches younger ages, to cement the theory on Global Warming or Climate Change as it tends to be called nowdays. Mainstream stigmatizes too easily ”Global Warming denier” when criticizing Albert Gore et al. and hits Glenn Beck as well. Something that oddly seems to fit DHS, in their telling effort to widen the definitions of ”homegrown radicalization”.

This also echoing in Sweden when TV4 Kalla fakta illustrate defamingly about truth seekers .. as ”extremist groups” and other labeling epithet. Subsequently you find the same phraseology (as some international friends) e.g. ”radicalization” by representatives in Swedish Government, sadly most likely a matter of time before this type of terminology changes its connotation.

and made this remix as a reaction, I suppose.